It was quite intriguing to have made the assumption that there would be a new phone. That’s cause Facebook is software centric and it wouldn’t make much business sense to compete on hardware with a much evolved and highly competitive market scenario. Hence, they made the correct logical choice of sticking to software. What exactly does this mean for us?
Since the update is to be rolled out on a select few Android OS phones, the experience is going to be reserved for a limited number of handsets. On the OS front, Facebook has everything to gain. The home screen will be more people centric, building around what is most relevant to the user. In the midst of the brouhaha, smaller apps are bound to get pushed in to a corner. While this could prove to be good for people who need a limited number of options, the more app crazy user such as me would find it cumbersome to keep going in to layers to use apps.
To an extent, this is pretty similar to the tile interface that windows phone have. This is a big debate, as to whether Facebook just stole Microsofts idea. Afterall they do have a huge base of nearly 700 million users that serve as a potential playground to roll this out to.
I wonder if this would actually be path breaking or is this another cog in the Facebook machine to justify that there are shreds of innovation that are in progress. After all, its backed by investors who would want to see some tangible development. While its still unclear as to how advertising would sit within the entire interface, there would surely be means to drive revenue. Going by the way the Windows OS was bluntly ignored, it would be interesting to see how Facebook Home pans out in terms of adoption levels.